COP10は？

互恵関係を調整するメカニズム　－　天秤方式


Beneficial Sharing Mechanism

だれが、考えたメカニズムでしょうか？


実務担当者は？


１．メカニズムの発案者

２．英語契約書のプロ


僕が関わった保守契約は？

FAM方式だったはず・・・

何の略だったっけ？


サプライ・チェーン・マネジメント

こういうのがあった

食物連鎖は？　フード・チェーン・店

食物循環は？　フード・リサイクル・システム


メカニズムをコーディネートする


こちらの方がベター？

The system of coordinating the beneficial sharing mechanism for keeping the life diversity among nations.

ここまで詰めたら、分からなくなるので、いかにして、このシステムを分かりやすく表現するか？

それが、最大のキーポイントだ・・・

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VF8-4N2D2S9-2&_user=10&_coverDate=07/31/2007&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_origin=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1518982872&_rerunOrigin=scholar.google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=5cee967f4f37841844513204f0f83299&searchtype=a

A mutually beneficial coordination mechanism for a one-supplier multi-retailers supply chain

Available online 15 February 2007. 

Abstract

In this study, we investigate devising a mutually beneficial coordination mechanism for a supply chain system consisting of a single supplier and a group of heterogeneous retailers. We employ the assumptions in the basic EOQ model, namely, deterministic demand, no shortages, and deterministic lead-time in our study. We also assume that the supplier has complete knowledge of the relevant cost parameters of the retailers. The supplier's (finite) production capacity is sufficient to meet the retailer's demand. All of the retailers follow an integer-ratio policy, i.e., each retailer purchases at an integer or reciprocal of an integer multiple of the supplier's setup interval. We assume that the maximum cost a retailer is prepared to incur cannot exceed its budget constraint when adopting the supplier's production setup interval. In this mutually beneficial coordination mechanism, the supplier offers a price discount to compensate the cost increase a retailer encounters from adopting the supplier's production setup interval. Therefore, our price–discount strategy encourages the retailers to coordinate their replenishment orders to accommodate the supplier's cost saving policies. Also, we propose a savings–sharing policy that asks the supplier to share part of its saving as retailers are willing to implement the designated replenishment schedule. Numerical experiments show that our mutually beneficial coordination mechanism could efficiently generate further cost savings for both the supplier and the retailers in the supply chain. The results also indicate that the cost savings for the supplier may not be sufficient to compensate the cost increase for the retailers when the major setup cost is below a threshold value.

Keywords: Supply chain coordination; Mutually beneficial; Lot-sizing

Article Outline

1. 

Introduction

2. 

Model description

2.1. Notation and assumptions

2.2. Mathematical model

3. 

Theorectical analysis and solution procedures

3.1. Piece-wise convex properties

3.1.1. The case of k_i{1,1/2,1/3,…}

3.1.2. The case of k_i{1,2,3,…}

3.2. The location of the breakpoints and junction points

3.2.1. For the case of k_i{1,1/2,1/3,…}

3.2.2. For the case of k_i{1,2,3,…}

3.3. The optimal k_i for any given T

3.4. The local minimum for each individual convex interval

3.5. An upper and a lower bound on the search range

3.6. The proposed search algorithm

4. 

Numerical experiments

5. 

Concluding remarks

Acknowledgements

References